Application of Network Analysis in Improving Project Management Using Project Evaluation and Review Techniques.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2026-1014-5592

Keywords:

Network Analysis, Project Evaluation and Review Techniques, Project scheduling, Project management

Abstract

This study investigates the application of the Project Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) in improving project management performance using the construction of the Technology Park at the Federal University of Technology (FUT), Minna, as a case study. Secondary data comprising project activities, precedence relationships, and time estimates were obtained from the project's programme of work. PERT analysis was employed using optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic activity time estimates to determine expected activity durations, identify critical activities, compute earliest and latest event times, and evaluate activity slack. The network model developed for the project enabled the identification of activities that significantly influence project completion time and highlighted areas where schedule flexibility exists. The results revealed varying slack times across non-critical activities, with notable float values observed in first-floor construction, roofing, metal works, and service installations. The analysis further established an expected project duration of approximately 61 weeks, providing a more realistic schedule under uncertainty than the original project timeline. The study demonstrates that the application of PERT enhances decision-making, improves resource allocation, facilitates effective monitoring of critical activities, and reduces the likelihood of project delays. It is therefore recommended that construction firms adopt PERT-based network analysis during project planning and execution to achieve improved scheduling accuracy and overall project performance.

References

Ahmad, A. M. (2012). Project management using critical path method (CPM): A pragmatic study. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 18(3-4), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjpas.v18i3-4.11

Bashir, H., Alhammadi, M., Ojiako, U., Shamsuzzaman, M., & Haridy, S. (2025). A social network analysis-based approach for modelling and analysing dependencies among requirements in new software development projects. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 17(4), 400–420. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPOM.2025.10070869

Danfulani, U. B., Mohammed, M., Reuben, B. Z., Yakubu, J. A., & Digil, S. I. (2023). Application of critical path method (CPM) to optimal project scheduling: A case of Mosul building company, Yola North Local Government Adamawa State, Nigeria. FUDMA Journal of Sciences, 7(3), 186-192. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2023-0703-1860

Figueroa-García, J. C., Hernández-Pérez, G., & Ramos-Cuesta, J. S. (2023). Uncertain project network analysis with fuzzy–PERT and interval type–2 fuzzy activity durations. Heliyon, 9(4), e14833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14833

Hosseini, A., & Farid, A. M. (2025). Extending resource constrained project scheduling to mega-projects with model-based systems engineering and hetero-functional graph theory. Systems Engineering. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.19035

Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (12th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Mansur, N., Alhassan, Z., & Abubakar, G. (2024). Efficient project management schedule for MSc studies in Northwestern Nigeria Universities, employed CPM and PERT. World Academics Journal of Engineering Sciences, 11(3), 17-21.

Oladimeji, O. A., Akomolafe, M. A., Lasisi, T. A., Oloja, O. A., & Oladimeji, L. A. (2023). Network analysis on phase 1B building of the university health centre, FUTA, using critical Path Method (CPM) and Project Evaluation Review Technique (PERT). International Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 6(1), 40-52.

Sharma, J. K. (2016). Operations research: Theory and applications (5th ed.). Macmillan Publishers India.

Singh, R., Kumar, R., & Sharma, V. (2023). Application of network analysis in construction project management: A systematic review. Journal of Construction Management, 18(1), 1-15.

Ukamaka, C. O. (2020). Implementation of project evaluation and review technique (PERT) and critical path method (CPM): A comparative study. International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management Research, 2(4), 1206-1207.

Zhasmukhambetova, A., Evdorides, H., & Davies, R. J. (2025). Integrating risk assessment and scheduling in highway construction: A systematic review of techniques, challenges, and hybrid methodologies. Future Transportation, 5(3), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp5030085

Critical Activities Diagram

Downloads

Published

15-08-2026

How to Cite

Ahmed, U., Nyor, N., & Shakirudeen, Y. (2026). Application of Network Analysis in Improving Project Management Using Project Evaluation and Review Techniques. FUDMA Journal of Sciences, 10(14), 109-113. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2026-1014-5592