STRUCTURE-BASED DISCOVERY OF ABSCISIC ACID RECEPTOR AGONISTS TARGETING ZMPYL9 AND ZMPYL12 FOR AGROCHEMICAL DEVELOPMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2026-1005-4987Keywords:
Abscisic acid (ABA), ZmPYL9, ZmPYL12, homology modelling, MM-GBSA, ligand binding affinity, agrochemical design, plant stress toleranceAbstract
Abiotic stress, particularly drought, remains a major limitation to crop productivity, necessitating innovative strategies to enhance plant resilience. Abscisic acid (ABA) signalling, mediated by PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors, plays a central role in stress adaptation; however, structural and functional insights into specific maize receptors such as ZmPYL9 and ZmPYL12 remain limited. This study employed an integrated computational approach to characterize these receptors and identify potential ABA-mimicking agrochemicals. High-quality homology models of ZmPYL9 and ZmPYL12 were constructed using templates with >94% sequence identity, yielding structurally robust models validated by stereochemical and non-bonded interaction metrics. Pharmacophore modelling and molecular docking revealed key ligand-binding features consistent with the canonical gate-latch-lock activation mechanism. Several compounds exhibited strong binding affinities (≤ −10 kcal/mol), while MM-GBSA analysis identified compounds 10661840 (−96.18 kcal/mol) and 10588337 (−93.21 kcal/mol) as the most stable ligands for ZmPYL9, and compound 134611692 (−94.73 kcal/mol) for ZmPYL12. Drug-likeness evaluation confirmed compliance with agrochemical criteria, while ADMET profiling indicated high bioavailability, low metabolic interference, and minimal toxicity. Notably, ZmPYL9 demonstrated superior ligand-binding performance, suggesting greater suitability for targeted modulation. This study therefore provide novel insights into receptor-specific ligand interactions and establishes a robust structure-based framework for the rational design of ABA agonists. The identified lead compounds represent promising candidates for developing environmentally safe agrochemicals aimed at improving crop tolerance to abiotic stress.Top of Form
References
Al Azzam, K. M., Negim, E. S., & Aboul-Enein, H. Y. (2022). ADME studies of TUG-770 (a GPR-40 inhibitor agonist) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes using SwissADME predictor: In silico study. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 12(4), 159-169.
Banerjee, P., Eckert, A. O., Schrey, A. K., & Preissner, R. (2018). ProTox-II: A webserver for the prediction of toxicity of chemicals. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(W1), W257–W263.
Bienert, S., Waterhouse, A., De Beer, T. A., Tauriello, G., Studer, G., Bordoli, L., & Schwede, T. (2017). The SWISS-MODEL Repository—new features and functionality. Nucleic acids research, 45(D1), D313-D319.
Colovos, C., & Yeates, T. O. (1993). Verification of protein structures: Patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein Science, 2(9), 1511–1519.
Daina, A., Michielin, O., & Zoete, V. (2017). SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Scientific Reports, 7, 42717.
Driver, K. E., Brunharo, C. A., & Al-Khatib, K. (2020). Mechanism of clomazone resistance in Leptochloa fusca spp. fasicularis to clomazone. Pesticide biochemistry and physiology, 162, 1-5.
Fidler, J., Graska, J., Gietler, M., Nykiel, M., Prabucka, B., Rybarczyk-Płońska, A., ... & Labudda, M. (2022). PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors play a vital role in the abscisic-acid-dependent responses of plants to external or internal stimuli. Cells, 11(8), 1352.
Genheden, S., & Ryde, U. (2015). The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 10(5), 449–461.
Melcher, K., Ng, L. M., Zhou, X. E., Soon, F. F., Xu, Y., Suino-Powell, K. M., ... & Xu, H. E. (2009). A gate–latch–lock mechanism for hormone signalling by abscisic acid receptors. Nature, 462(7273), 602-608.
Park, S. Y., Fung, P., Nishimura, N., Jensen, D. R., Fujii, H., Zhao, Y., ... & Cutler, S. R. (2009). Abscisic acid inhibits PP2Cs via the PYR/PYL family of ABA-binding START proteins. Science (New York, NY), 324(5930), 1068.
Petrović, S., & Leskovac, A. (2026). Biopesticides and Human Health Risks: A Critical Review. Toxics, 14(3), 246.
Pires, D. E., Blundell, T. L., & Ascher, D. B. (2015). pkCSM: predicting small-molecule pharmacokinetic and toxicity properties using graph-based signatures. Journal of medicinal chemistry, 58(9), 4066-4072.
Sah, S. K., Reddy, K. R., & Li, J. (2016). Abscisic acid and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Frontiers in plant science, 7, 571.
Sharma, R., & Sharma, P. (2023). Role of Abscisic acid in plant stress. In New insights into phytohormones. IntechOpen.pp1-27
Studer, G., Rempfer, C., Waterhouse, A. M., Gumienny, R., Haas, J., & Schwede, T. (2020). QMEANDisCo—distance constraints applied on model quality estimation. Bioinformatics, 36(6), 1765-1771.
Tian, W., Chen, C., Lei, X., Zhao, J., & Liang, J. (2018). CASTp 3.0: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins. Nucleic acids research, 46(W1), W363-W367.
Tice, C. M. (2001). Selecting the right compounds for screening: does Lipinski's Rule of 5 for pharmaceuticals apply to agrochemicals?. Pest Management Science: formerly Pesticide Science, 57(1), 3-16.
Waterhouse, A., Bertoni, M., Bienert, S., Studer, G., Tauriello, G., Gumienny, R., Heer, F. T., de Beer, T. A. P., Rempfer, C., Bordoli, L., Lepore, R., & Schwede, T. (2018). SWISS-MODEL: Homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(W1), W296–W303.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 AbdulAziz Ayinla, Ahmad S. Ibrahim, Wasiu O Opadokun, Umar B. Olayinka, Amudalat R Lawal, AbdulAzeez Balogun, AbdulRasheed O Koiki, Quam A Alao, Sunday A. Oyelekan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
