INVESTIGATION ON THE ENVIROMENTAL EFFECT OF LOCAL PRODUCTION METHOD OF ALUMINIUM UTENSIL IN KANO

Authors

  • Y. I. Yakubu
  • I. A. Yola

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2020-0403-389

Keywords:

Pollution; Utensils, Absorption, Concentration, Spectrophotometer, Permissible

Abstract

This research investigated the environmental effect of local production methods of aluminium utensils in Bachirawa, Ungogo local government Kano. Three soil samples and two samples of water were collected from sites A, B,C, D and E. The samples were then taken to faculty of agriculture for analysis. Atomic absorption spectrophotometer (A A S model No 240 FSAA) was used to determine the concentration levels of heavy metals in the samples. The results show that, the concentration levels of  heavy metals in the soil samples A, B and C are:  Zn ranges between  (1158.13 - 11,117.80)  mg/kg; Mn  between  (285.719 – 1809.672) mg/kg; Cd between (0.026 – 0.540) mg/kg; Cr (0.498 – 0.832) mg/kg and Pb between (42.54 - 285.53) mg/kg. The observed concentration levels in water samples for Zn ranges between (0.2411 – 0.4435)mg/l; Cd between (0.091 – 0.123) mg/l; Cr between (0.015 – 0.022) mg/l; Mn between (0.284 – 0.728) mg/l and Pb between (0.00-0.08) mg/l. Zinc and Manganese have higher concentration levels than the recommended  permissible limit set by European Union (EU) and  United Kingdom(UK)  while Cd, Cr and  Pb have lower concentration levels than the recommended permissible limit set by EU and UK in soil samples  A, B and C. The concentration levels of Mn, Cd and Pb in water samples were higher than the permissible limit set by World Healh Organization (WHO) whereas Zn and Cr have concentrations lower than the recommended permissible limit set by 

References

REFERENCES

Ado, S.G., Showemimo, F.A., Alabi, S.O., BadoAparaku,B., Menkir,A., Usman,I.S. and Abdullahi, U.S (2007). Maize Research at I.A.R. Samary P. 107-122. Badu-Apraku, B., Fakorede, M.A.B., Lum, A.F., Menkir, A., Quedruogo, M. (eds). 2007. Demand-drive technologies for sustainable maize production in west and central Africa. Proceeding of the fifth biennial regional maize workshop, IITA. Cotonou, Benin, 3-6 May, 2005. WECAMAN/IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria pp. 515.

Bello, O.B, Abdulmaliq S.Y Ige S.A. mohamood Oluley F. Azeez M.A Afolabi M.S, (2012) Evaluation of early late/intermediate maize verity for grain field potential ad adaptation to a southern guinea savannah agro Ecology of Nigeria. Infinality Jounal of plant Research. P-ISSN: 2163-2596 eISSN 2163-260x 2012; 2(2): 14-21.

Caitt, B.E. (2005). The growth and yield parameter of maize as influenced by varying plant densities and NPK fertilization. Journal of Applied Science, 3(2):18-24.

Chauddary, G.A., Habib, C., Sadiq, M. and Khan, M.A. (1993). Effect of Nitrogen Phosphorus and Plant Population on Grain Yield of Dry land maize. Journal of Agricultural Research, 27(1):19-25.

Duncan, D.B. (1955). Multiple Range and Multiple “F†Festi. Biometric, 11:42. ICRISAT (1997): West African Programmes 1998 Annual Report Niamey, Niger ICRISAT.

Duncan, D.B. (1955). Multiple Ranges and Multiple F. Tests. Biimetrics, 11(1):1-42.

Hassan, N., Khan and Baloch, M.S. (2011). Screening Maize varieties for grain at Dera. Ismail Khan. Journal of Animal and Plant Science, 21(3):626-628.

Hokmahpoor, A.G., and Darbandi, M.H. (2011). Physiological Growth Indices in Corn (Zea may L.) Cultivars as affected by Nitrogen fertilizer levels. World Applied Sciences Journal, 15(12):1800-1805. IDOSI Publication, ISSN 1818-4952.

Igbal, M., Khan, K., Rahman, H. and Hassan, S. (2010a). Detection of epistasis for Plant Level and Leaf area per plant in maize (Zea mays L.) from generation means analysis medica, Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 55(3):33-30.

Igbal, M., Khan, K., Rahman, H., Hassan, S., Khalil, I.A. and SharhandBkht, J. (2010b). Heterosis for morphological traits in Subtropical Maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica, Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 55(4)41-48.

ITAT, (2007). Fertilizer requirements of Major cereals of Nigerian Savannah. Paper Presented at the National Fertilizer Seminar, Port-Harcourt, pp. 50.

Nazir, H., Zaman, Q., Amjad, M. and Ed Aziz, N.A. (2010). Response of Maize varieties under Agricultural Ecological Condition of Bera. Ismail Khan Journal of Agricultural Research, 48(1):59-63.

Niaz, A., Yaseen, M., Arshad, M. and Ahmad, R. (2015). Response of Maize yield, Quality and Nitrogen use efficiency indices in different roles and application timings. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 25(4):2015, Pp. 1022-1031. ISSN: 1018-7081.

Nweke, I. A., and Nsoanya, L. N. (2013). Evaluation of different NPK (15:15:15) Fertilizer levels on an improved maize variety in proceedings of the 47th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Society of Nigeria, Ibadan 2013. P 19 – 22.

Song, J.M., Li, H.S., Dai, S., Liu, A.F., Cheng, D.G., Liu, J.J. and Zhao, Z.D. (2010). Yield components analysis of Jimai 22 with high yield potential and wide adaptation. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Science, 24(6):1280-1285.

Valero, J.A., Joan, Matro, M., Ramirez, A.A., Martin, Benito, J.M.J. and Advarez, J.F.O. (2005). Growth and Nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated maize in a semi arid region as affected by nitrogen fertilizer. Spermotological Journal of Agricultural Science, Pp. 134-144.

Veen, R.J. (2007). Influence of Organic and Chemical Fertilizer son the growth, yield and yield component of maize. Journal of Crop Science Research, 7(6):7510756.

Wang, X., Chang, J., Qin, G., Zhang, J., Cheng, X. and Li, C. (2011). Analysis of Yield Components of elite maize variety zundan 20 with super high yield potential. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(24):5490-5495.

Yakakawa, T., Hee, C.J.I. and Jin0woong, C.H.O. (2006). Detailed Analysis of Plant and ear lights in tropical maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Faculty of Agriculture. Kysho University, 51(2).

Published

2020-09-23

How to Cite

Yakubu, Y. I., & Yola, I. A. (2020). INVESTIGATION ON THE ENVIROMENTAL EFFECT OF LOCAL PRODUCTION METHOD OF ALUMINIUM UTENSIL IN KANO. FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES, 4(3), 256 - 262. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2020-0403-389