PERFORMANCE OF THREE MAIZE VARIETIES AS INFLUENCED BY NPK FERTILIZER RATES AND INTRA-ROW SPACINGS AT SAMARU, NORTHERN GUINEA SAVANNA, NIGERIA

Authors

  • A. Muhammad
  • H. Mani Department of Agronomy, ABU Zaria
  • R. Ibrahim
  • S. Bugaje
  • H. Dauda Department of Agronomy, ABU Zaria
  • M. H. Saleh Department of Agronomy, FUDMA
  • B. A. Mahmoud Department of Crop Production, Federal College of Horticulture, Dadin Kowa, Gombe State
  • F. D. Dalhat Department of Soil SCience, Fudma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2024-0806-2743

Keywords:

Performance, Maize, Varieties, NPK fertilizer, Plant density, Savanna

Abstract

A number of studies conducted revealed a number of factors militating against large scale production of maize in the study area to include among other things such as low soil fertility, low and poorly distribution of rainfall, nonuse of optimum plant density, poor implementation of improved Agronomic practices and use of indigenous local and often un improved maize varieties. An experiment comprised of three NPK fertilizer rates, four intra -row spacings and three maize varieties was undertaken. The treatments were arranged in a Split plot design with fertilizer rates and intra row spacings assigned to main plot and varieties in the sub plot using three replications. Results obtained revealed that each increase in NPK fertilizer from 200 to 400 kg ha-1 significantly produced taller plants, longer ear height, heavier 100- grain weight, and grain yield while number of days to 50% tasseling became reduced with increased in NPK fertilizer rates. Each increase in intra- row spacing from 20 to 50 cm significantly enhanced all the growth and yield attributes of the crop. SAMMAZ 40 maize variety significantly produced taller plants, longer ear height and took longer days to attain days to 50% tasseling, higher 100-grain weight, and grain yield than the other two varieties that were statistically similar. It can be concluded that for good growth and yield, use of SAMMAZ 40 maize variety, use of 400 NPK kg ha-1 planted at 20 or 25 cm intra row spacings could be recommended to farmers at Samaru.

References

Arabmofrad, S., Bagheri, M., Rajabi, H., & Jafari, S. M. (2020). Nanoadsorbents and nanoporous materials for the food industry. Handbook of Food Nanotechnology, 107-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815866-1.00004-2

Ettish, M. N., El-Sayyad, G. S., Elsayed, M. A., & Abuzalat, O. (2021). Preparation and characterization of new adsorbent from Cinnamon waste by physical activation for removal of Chlorpyrifos. Environmental challenges, 5, 100208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100208

Forouzesh, M., Ebadi, A., Aghaeinejad-Meybodi, A., & Khoshbouy, R. (2019). Transformation of persulfate to free sulfate radical over granular activated carbon: effect of acidic oxygen functional groups. Chemical Engineering Journal, 374, 965-974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.220

Gayathiri, M., Pulingam, T., Lee, K. T., & Sudesh, K. (2022). Activated carbon from biomass waste precursors: Factors affecting production and adsorption mechanism. Chemosphere, 294, 133764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133764

Kierzek, K., & Gryglewicz, G. (2020). Activated carbons and their evaluation in electric double layer capacitors. Molecules, 25(18), 4255. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184255

Kosheleva, R. I., Mitropoulos, A. C., & Kyzas, G. Z. (2019). Synthesis of activated carbon from food waste. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 17, 429-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-0817-5

Lay, M., Rusli, A., Abdullah, M. K., Hamid, Z. A. A., & Shuib, R. K. (2020). Converting dead leaf biomass into activated carbon as a potential replacement for carbon black filler in rubber composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 201, 108366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108366

Lobato-Peralta, D. R., Duque-Brito, E., Ayala-Cortés, A., Arias, D. M., Longoria, A., Cuentas-Gallegos, A. K., ... & Okoye, P. U. (2021). Advances in activated carbon modification, surface heteroatom configuration, reactor strategies, and regeneration methods for enhanced wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(4), 105626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105626

Morin-Crini N, Loiacono S, Placet V et al (2019) Hemp-based adsorbents for sequestration of metals: a review. Environ Chem Lett 17:393–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-0812-x

Musah, M., Matthew, J. T., Azeh, Y., Badeggi, U. M., Muhammad, A. I., Abu, L. M., & Muhammad, K. T. (2024). Preparation and characterization of adsorbent from waste shea (Vitellaria paradoxa) nut shell. Fudma Journal of Sciences, 8(2), 338-344. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2024-0802-2370

Quesada, H. B., de Araújo, T. P., Vareschini, D. T., de Barros, M. A. S. D., Gomes, R. G., & Bergamasco, R. (2020). Chitosan, alginate and other macromolecules as activated carbon immobilizing agents: a review on composite adsorbents for the removal of water contaminants. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 164, 2535-2549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.118

Regunton, P. C. V., Sumalapao, D. E. P., & Villarante, N. R. (2018). Biosorption of Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solution by Coconut (Cocos nucifera) Shell-derived Activated Carbon-chitosan Composite. Oriental Journal of Chemistry, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.13005/OJC%2F340113

Tazibet, S., Velasco, L. F., Lodewyckx, P., Abou M’Hamed, D., & Boucheffa, Y. (2018). Study of the carbonization temperature for a chemically activated carbon: influence on the textural and structural characteristics and surface functionalities. Journal of Porous Materials, 25, 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-017-0444-8

Wang, S., Xie, C., Wang, S., Hang, F., Li, W., Li, K., ... & Shi, C. (2022). Facile ultrasonic-assisted one-step preparation of sugarcane bagasse carbon sorbent for bio-based odor removal cat litter formulation. Industrial Crops and Products, 187, 115493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115493

Yousefi M, Arami SM, Takallo H et al (2019) Modification of pumice with HCl and NaOH enhancing its fluoride adsorption capacity: kinetic and isotherm studies. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 25:1508– 1520. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1469968

Published

2024-11-29

How to Cite

Muhammad, A., Mani, H., Ibrahim, R., Bugaje, S., Dauda, H., Saleh, M. H., Mahmoud, B. A., & Dalhat , F. D. (2024). PERFORMANCE OF THREE MAIZE VARIETIES AS INFLUENCED BY NPK FERTILIZER RATES AND INTRA-ROW SPACINGS AT SAMARU, NORTHERN GUINEA SAVANNA, NIGERIA . FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES, 8(6), 87 - 90. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2024-0806-2743

Most read articles by the same author(s)