NANOBIOPESTICIDES IN POST-HARVEST MANAGEMENT OF INSECT PESTS OF CROPS: PRESENT STATUS, CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS – A REVIEW

Authors

  • Rukayat Q. Adegbola Nigerian Stored Products Research Institute
  • S. A. Atanda
  • M. O. Jimoh
  • N. F. Okparavero
  • M. B. Aremu
  • O. A. Ajayi
  • A. F. Onyegbula
  • A. F. Okunlade
  • J. A Adegbola

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2024-0804-2557

Keywords:

Delivery system, Eco-friendly, Micro-organism, Nanotechnology, Nanometer, Sustainability

Abstract

The major universal challenge on our planet is the issue of establishing food security for a rapidly increasing population in the world. Farmers all over the world focus on using new innovations and technologies for enhancing the production and storage of crops through intensive and extensive agriculture. The current efforts lead to the formation of nanopesticides and nanobiopesticides (NBPs) which has been made possible by advances in nanotechnology. Nanotechnology is one of the promising areas to boost the availability of food and to manufacture newer products for beneficial purposes in agriculture, food, water, the environment, medicine, energy, and electronics.NBPs are made using a variety of surfactants, polymers, nanoemulsions, nanocapsules, and metal nanoparticles with sizes in the nanometer range. These NBPs with an elevated surface-to-volume ratio are able to target organisms more effectively and persistently than traditional pesticides because of their physical characteristics and may continue to be effective for longer periods of time. In comparison to conventional pesticides, NBPs have the potential to improve the environment by decreasing toxicity, extending the shelf life of agricultural produce with the aid of nanoparticles, and enhancing the solubility of pesticides that are poorly soluble in water. However, the commercialization of NBPs faces significant obstacles due to their applicability in real-world settings, legal compliance, and market acceptability. Enhancing the usage and spread of NBPs are beneficial in reducing the number of spread chemicals, minimize nutrient losses in fertilization, and increased yield through pest and nutrient management.

References

Adie, D. B., Lukman, S., Sani, B., & Yahaya, I. A. (2013). Comparative Analysis of Filtration Using Corn Cob, Bone Char, and Wood Chippings. June 2014.

Ahmad, T., & Danish, M. (2018). Prospects of banana waste utilization in wastewater treatment: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 206, 330–348.

Arjun, N. (2020). Uniformity Coefficient(Cu) and Coefficient of Curvature(Cc) of Soil. Geotechnical Engineering.

Balasundram, V., Ibrahim, N., Kasmani, R. M., Hamid, M. K. A., Isha, R., Hasbullah, H., & Ali, R. R. (2017). Thermogravimetric catalytic pyrolysis and kinetic studies of coconut copra and rice husk for possible maximum production of pyrolysis oil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 218–228.

Bolisetty, S., Peydayesh, M., & Mezzenga, R. (2019). Sustainable technologies for water purification from heavy metals: review and analysis. Chemical Society Reviews, 48(2), 463–487.

Huang, T., Zhou, R., Cui, J., Zhang, J., Tang, X., Chen, S., Feng, J., & Liu, H. (2018). Fast and cost-effective preparation of antimicrobial zinc oxide embedded in activated carbon composite for water purification applications. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 206, 124–129.

Iwuozor, K. O., Emenike, E. C., Stephen, A. A., Kevin, O. S., Adeleke, J., & Adeniyi, A. G. (2023). Thermochemical recycling of waste disposable facemasks in a non-electrically powered system. Low-Carbon Materials and Green Construction, 1(1), 12.

Jayawardane, N. S. (1996). Handbook of water and wastewater treatment technology. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 60(2–3), 213–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8809(97)87011-9

Jiang, C., Yakaboylu, G. A., Yumak, T., Zondlo, J. W., Sabolsky, E. M., & Wang, J. (2020). Activated carbons prepared by indirect and direct CO2 activation of lignocellulosic biomass for supercapacitor electrodes. Renewable Energy, 155, 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.111

Lew, D. (2021). Acidity And Alkalinity - Water Quality.

Lingamdinne, L. P., Koduru, J. R., & Karri, R. R. (2019). A comprehensive review of applications of magnetic graphene oxide-based nanocomposites for sustainable water purification. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 622–634.

Louis, N. S. M., & Sudha, S. (2013). Activated carbon from corn starch for treating dye wastewater. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 2(9), 45–53.

Manimaran, S., Vithusan, U., Swathy, P., Noor, A. M. I., & Viswanath, T. (2019). Portable Tap Water Filter Using Activated Carbon from Natural Waste Materials. 6(7), 422–429.

Mansour, F., Al-Hindi, M., Yahfoufi, R., Ayoub, G. M., & Ahmad, M. N. (2018). The use of activated carbon for the removal of pharmaceuticals from aqueous solutions: a review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 17, 109–145.

Mohd Samdin, S., Peng, L. H., & Marzuki, M. (2015). Investigation of coconut shells activated carbon as the cost-effective absorbent in drinking water filter. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(22), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6656

Odetoye, T. E., Onifade, K. R., AbuBakar, M. S., & Titiloye, J. O. (2013). Thermochemical characterization of Parinari polyandra Benth fruit shell. Industrial Crops and Products, 44, 62–66.

Oladipo, A. A., & Ifebajo, A. O. (2018). Highly efficient magnetic chicken bone biochar for removal of tetracycline and fluorescent dye from wastewater: two-stage adsorber analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 209, 9–16.

Regti, A., Laamari, M. R., Stiriba, S.-E., & El Haddad, M. (2017). Potential use of activated carbon derived from Persea species under alkaline conditions for removing cationic dye from wastewater. Journal of the Association of Arab Universities for Basic and Applied Sciences, 24, 10–18.

Reza, S., Yun, C. S., Afroze, S., Radenahmad, N., Bakar, M. S. A., Saidur, R., Taweekun, J., & Abul, K. (2020). Preparation of activated carbon from biomass and its ’ applications in water and gas purification, a review. Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 27(1), 208–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2020.1766799

Ripperger, S., Gösele, W., Alt, C., & Loewe, T. (2013). Filtration, 1. Fundamentals. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (pp. 1–38). https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.b02_10.pub3

Scherer, T., & Johnson, R. (2015). Filtration : Sediment, Activated Carbon, and Mixed Media. In Extension Agricultural Engineer North Dakota State University (Vol. 1, Issue 11, pp. 200–203).

Sutherland, K. (2008). Filters and Filtration Handbook, Fifth Edition. In Elsevier (Fifth). Elsevier.

Teow, Y. H., & Mohammad, A. W. (2019). New generation nanomaterials for water desalination: A review. Desalination, 451, 2–17.

WHO. (2008). WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. https://doi.org/10.1248/jhs1956.35.307

WHO. (2017). Guidelines for Drinking_water Quality.

Yang, Z., Zhou, Y., Feng, Z., Rui, X., Zhang, T., & Zhang, Z. (2019). A review on reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes for water purification. Polymers, 11(8), 1252.

Published

2024-07-30

How to Cite

Adegbola, R. Q., Atanda, S. A., Jimoh, M. O., Okparavero, N. F., Aremu, M. B., Ajayi, O. A., Onyegbula, A. F., Okunlade, A. F., & Adegbola, J. A. (2024). NANOBIOPESTICIDES IN POST-HARVEST MANAGEMENT OF INSECT PESTS OF CROPS: PRESENT STATUS, CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS – A REVIEW. FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES, 8(4), 40 - 54. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2024-0804-2557