ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION PATTERN OF FUEL WOOD AND CHARCOAL IN ZARIA LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA, KADUNA STATE, NIGERIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2021-0502-637Keywords:
Distribution, Pattern, Fuel Wood, Charcoal, Zaria.Abstract
Energy use is an essential requirement for socioeconomic development of any society. This research aimed at analyzing fuel wood and charcoal distribution pattern in Zaria Local Government Area Kaduna State Nigeria. The aim was achieved through the following objectives which are to: identify the distribution of fuel wood depots in the study area; analyse the distribution pattern of fuel wood in the study area and examine the seasonality, time and mode of fuel wood distribution in the study area. This research used both quantitative and qualitative method in data analysis. Findings from the research revealed two types of fuel wood vendor depots exists in the study area which are classified as either major or minor types which shows that fuel wood vendor depots are mostly concentrated around the residential areas especially within the built-up land, also, charcoal is mostly sourced around Kachia and Lokoja Abuja Express way. Results from in-depth interview with the fuel wood vendors indicates that there are two types of fuel wood vendors: the mobile and the stationary vendors. It has been recommended in this study that the Government should come up with a policy guidelines to regulate and sanitise the number of minor fuel wood depots in the study area for a cleaner, safer and regulated environment. The relevant authorities should promulgate penalties for violators of the policy guidelines in order to ensure that the environment is kept safe from soil degradation as a result of the activities of the fuel wood depots and environmental pollution.
References
AFSCA. (2013). Responsible use of antimicrobials in livestock and the effect of resistance selection. [http:/ / www.afsca.be/ wetenschappelijkcomite/ adviezen/ _documents/ ADVIES19-2013_NL_DossierSciCom2012- 10.pdf] webcite FASFC.
Anadon A, Martinezlarranaga MR, Diaz MJ, Bringas P, Martinez MA, Fernandezcruz ML, Fernandez MC, Fernandez R. (1995). Pharmacokinetics and residues of enrofloxacin in chickens. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 56(4):501-506.
Andrews, J. M. (2008): BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (Version 7): For the BSAC working party on susceptibility testing. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 62:256–278
Andrews, J. M. (2001). Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 48:5–16
Béraud, R., Huneault, L., Bernier, D., Beaudry, F., Letellier, A., Jérôme R.E and del Castillo. (2008). Comparison of the selection of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli during enrofloxacin administration with a local drug delivery system or with intramuscular injections in a swine model. The Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 72:311–319
Berg, J. (1988). Clinical indications for enrofloxacin in domestic animals and poultry. In: Quinolones: A new class of antimicrobial agents for use in veterinary medicine. In: Proc. West Veterinary Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada: Mobay Corporation.
Brown, S. A. (1996). Fluoroquinolones in animal health. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 19:1-14
Dennesen, P. J., M. J. Bonten and R.A. Weinstein. (1998). Multiresistant bacteria as a hospital epidemic problem. Annal Medicine. 30: 176-185.
European agency for the evaluation of medicinal products (EMEA). (1998). Enrofloxacin modification for bovine, porcine and poultry. Committee for Veterinary
Medicinal products. Veterinary medicine evaluation unit. Summary report 2. EMEA/MRL/388/98
Fabrega A, Sanchez-Cespedes J, Soto S, Vila J. (2008). Quinolone resistance in the food chain. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 31(4):307-315.
FDA. (2005).FDA Announces Final Decision About Veterinary Medicine. [http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2005/ucm10 8467.htm]webcite FDA.
Ganière, J. P., C. Mèdaille, A. Limet, N. Ruvoen, G. A. Fontaine (2001). Antimicrobial activity of enrofloxacin against Staphylococcus intermedius strains isolated from canine pyodermas. Veterinary Dermatology. 12, 171-177.
Gonzalez, E. A. and J. Blanco, (1989). Serotypes and antibiotic resistance of verotoxigenic (VTEC) and necrotizing (NTEC) Escherichia coli strains isolated from calves with diarrhoea. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 51, 31-36.
Harnett, N. M. and C. L. Gyles, (1984). Resistance to drugs and heavy metals, colicin production, and biochemical characteristics of selected bovine and porcine Escherichia coli strains. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 48: 930- 935.
Hawkey, P. M. (2003).Mechanisms of quinolone action and microbial response. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 51(suppl 1), 29-35.
Hinz K. H. and Rottmann S. (1990). Studies in vivo on the efficacy of enrofloxacin against Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Avian Pathology. 19, 511–522.
Irwin, R. J., S. A., McEwen, R. C., Clarke and A. H., Meek, (1989). The prevalence of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli and antimicrobial resistance patterns of nonverocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario broiler chickens. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research. 53: 411- 418.
Jones, R. N. and M. E. Erwin, (1998). In vitro susceptibility testing and quality control parameters for sarafloxacin (A-56620): a fluoroquinolone used for treatment and control of colibacillosis in poultry. Quality Control Study Group. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 32 (1): 55- 64.
Lee, M and L., Arp. (1998). Colibacillosis. In: A Laboratory Manual for the Isolation and Identification of Avian Pathogens. D., Swayne, J. Glisson, M. Jackwood, J. Pearson, and W. Reed, ed. American Association of Avian Pathology. 4: 14–16.Kennett Square, PA.
Muller, E and Hom S. (2009). Efficacy of ciprofloxacin and marbofloxacin against bacterial isolates from dogs and cats. Invitro resistance study. Antimicrobial Agents Chemotherapy.43: 516-525.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (1999). Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A3. National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards. Wayne, P. A
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (2001). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Eleventh Informational Supplement. NCCLS Document M100-S11, Vol. 21, No. 1, NCCLS, Wayne, P. A
Orden, J., J. Ruiz Santa Quiteria, S. Garcia, and R., De La Fuente (1999).In vitro activities of E. coli strains isolated from diarrhoeic dairy calves. Antimicrobial Agents Chemotherapy.43: 510-513.
Piriz, S., J. Walle, E. M. Mateos, R. De La Fuente, D. Cid, J. A. Ruiz-Santaquiteria, S. Vadillo (1996).In vitro activity of fifteen antimicrobial agents against methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptibile Staphylococcus intermedius. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 19: 118-123.
Smith, J. L., D. J. V. Drum, Y. Dai, J. M. Kim, S. Sanchez, J. J. Maurer, C. L. Hofacre and M. D. Lee, (2007). Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73: 1404–1414.
Vandemaele, F., M. Vereecken, J. Derijcke and B. M. Goddeeris. (2002). Incidence and antibiotic resistance of pathogenic Escherichia coli among poultry in Belgium. Veterinary Records. 151: 355-356.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
FUDMA Journal of Sciences
