YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.) VARIETIES AS INFLUENCED BY PLANT POPULATION AND TIME OF NITROGEN SECOND DOSE APPLICATION IN GUINEA SAVANNAH OF NIGERIA

  • Muhammad K. Ladan Federal University Dutsin-Ma
  • Abdulhadi Muhammad Federal University Dutsin-Ma
  • Sanusi Jari Federal University Dutsin-Ma
Keywords: Maize, Nigerian Savannah, Plant population, Time of nitrogen second dose application, Variety, Yield

Abstract

The Study was carried out simultaneously at two location namely; Institute for Agricultural Research IAR, A.B.U., Samaru- Zaria (11011’N 07038E and 686m above sea level) and College of Agriculture and Animal Science, Farm Mando, Kaduna (Lat 10o43’N, Long 06o34’E 500m above sea level) both located in the Northern Guinea Savannah Ecological Zone of Nigeria respectively during 2023/2024 cropping season, to evaluate the effect of plant population and time of nitrogen second dose application on yield and yield attributes of three maize varieties in Nigerian savannah. Treatments consisted of Three maize varieties; SAMMAZ 15, SAMMAZ 16, and SAMMAZ 17, three plant populations levels; P1 (40,000 plants ha-1), P2 (60,000 plants ha-1) and P3 (80,000 plants ha-1) and five times of nitrogen second dose application; 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 weeks after sowing (WAS). Treatment were factorially combined in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) and replicated three times. Data on yield parameters collected were number of cobs plant-1, number of kernels pod-1,cob length, cob diameter and kernel yield kg ha-1. Results showed that 60,000 plants ha-1had the best performance on yield parameters and gave the highest maize yield kg ha-1, followed by 40,000 plants ha-1 and 80,000 plants ha-1 respectively. Second dose of nitrogen application at 6 WAS resulted in higher growth attributes and gave the highest grain yield kg ha-1 over other timings evaluated and SAMMAZ 16 outperformed the other varieties in terms of yield attributes and gave the highest grain yield in kg ha-1. The study recommends that...

References

Abendroth, L.J, Elmore R.W, Boyer, M.J and Marlay, S.K. (2011). Corn (Zea mays L.) growth and development.PMR 1009. Iowa State University, ext Ames. IA

Adhikari, K., Bhandari, S., Aryal, K., Mahato, M., and Shrestha, J., (2021). Effect of different levels of nitrogen on growth and yield of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) varieties. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4(2), Pp. 4862. https://doi.org/10.3126/janr.v4i2.33656

Adhikary, B. H., Baral, B. R., and Shrestha, J., (2020). Productivity of winter maize (Zea mays L.) as affected by varieties and fertilizer levels. International Journal of Applied Biology, 4(1), Pp. 8593. https://doi.org/10.20956/ijab.v4i1.10192

Allessi, J. and Power, J. F. (2004). Effect of plant population, row spacing and relative maturity on dry land corn (Zea mays L.) in the Northern plans. Agronomy Journal 66(2): 316-319.

Anonymous, (2012). Advisory Service Manual on Maize (Zea mays L.) Value Chain. KDCADP Maize Extension Bulletin Series 1. An IAR/NAERLS publication. Zaria, Nigeria.pp 14.

Chaudhary, G. A, Habib C, Sadiq M. and Khan, M.A(1999). Effect of nitrogen, Phosphorus and plant population on grain yield of dry land maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agricultural Research.27:19-25pp

DAE, (2015) Krishi Diary. Agricultural Information Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Khamar Bari, Dhaka 1215, pp. 13.

Duncan, D. B., (1955). Multiple Ranges and multiple F-test. Biometrics11: 1-42

Emam Y (2001). Sensitivity of grain yield components to plant population density in non-prolific maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 71(6): 367-370.

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2012) Production report of agricultural crops, 2010

FAOSTAT, (2019). Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), FAO Statistical Database from: http://faostat.fao.org

FAOSTAT, (2020). Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), FAO Statistical Database from: http://faostat.fao.org

Gambin, B.L; L.Borras and Otegui, (2006). Source- sink relations and kernel weight differences

Hafiz M.H Ashfaq.W Javaid A., (2011). Maize response to time and rate of Nitrogen Application Pakistan journal of Botanical season. 43(4): 1935 1942 2011.

Kwaga, Y.M. (2014). Effect of time of nitrogen application on the performance of Maize (Zea mays L.) variety at Mubi, Northern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria. American Journal of Research Communication. www.iesa-journal.com

Ladan, K.M (2018). Response Of Maize (Zea Mays L.) Varieties to Time of Second Dose of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application in Northern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria. An unpublished MSc Thesis submitted to department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria-Nigeria.

Liu W., M. Tollenaar and G. Smith (2004). Within row plant spacing variability does not affect corn yield. Agron. J. 96: 275-280

Luque S. F., A. G. Cirilo and M. E. Otegui (2006). Genetic gains in grain yield and related physiological attributes in Argentine maize hybrids. Field Crop Res. 95: 383-397.

Munamava M. R., A. S. Goggi and L. Pollak (2006). Seed quality of maize inbred lines with different composition and genetic backgrounds. Crop Sci. 44: 542-548

Novacek. M.J., S.C. Mason, T.D. Galusha, and M. Yaseen. (2013). Twin rows minimally

Rokon G, Hasan Khan M, Bahadur M, Shanto M, Khairul A (2019). Effects of Leaf Clipping and Population Density on Green Fodder and Grain Yield in Hybrid Maize. Nov Res Sci.1(3). Article in Novel Research in Sciences NRS.000515.2019. https://doi.org/10.31031/NRS.2019.1.000515 February 2024

Saberali S F (2007). Influence of plant density and planting pattern of corn on its growth and yield under competition with common Lambesquarters (Chenopodium album L.). Pajouhesh and Sazandegi. 74: 143-152.

Sangakkara U. R., P. S. R. D. Bandaranayake, J. N. Gajanayake and P. Stamp (2004). Plant populations and yield of rainfed maize grown in wet and dry seasons of the tropics. Maydica. 49: 83-88

Shiferaw B, Prasanna B, Hellin J, Banziger M (2011) Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Security 3(1): 307-327.

Song JM, Li HS, Dai S, Liu AF Cheng Dg, Liu J,J Zhao ZD (2010). Yield component analysis of jimai 22 with super high yield potential and wide adaptation. Journal. Nuclear, Agricultural science,24(6):1280-1285

Svecnjack, Z., B. Varga and J Butorac(2006). Yield components of apical and sub apical ear contribution to the grain yield response of prolific maize at high and low plant population. J.Agric. Crop Sci. 192:37-42

Valero J.A Juan, Matro, M., Ramirez A.A. Martin Benito J.M.T and Advarez J.F.O., (2005). Growth and Nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated maize in a semi arid region as affected by nitrogen fertilizer Spermol Journal.de Agricultures. 134-144.

Valero J.A Juan, Matro, M., Ramirez A.A. Martin Benito J.M.T and Advarez J.F.O., (2005). Growth and Nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated maize in a semi arid region as affected by nitrogen fertilizer Spermol Journal.de Agricultures. 134-144.

Wang, X., Chang, J., Qin, G.,Zhang, S., Cheng, X and Li,C. (2011). Analysis of yield components of elite maize variety Xundan 20 with super high yield potential. African. Journal. Agric Research.,6(24):5490-5495.

Zamir, M.S.I., Ahmad, A.H., Javeed, M.R. and Latif, T. (2011). Growth and yield behavior of two maize hybrids (Zea mays L.) towards different plant spacing. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova, 14(2): 33-40. http://doi.org/10.2478/v10298-012 -0030-9

Published
2025-06-30
How to Cite
Ladan, M. K., Muhammad, A., & Jari, S. (2025). YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.) VARIETIES AS INFLUENCED BY PLANT POPULATION AND TIME OF NITROGEN SECOND DOSE APPLICATION IN GUINEA SAVANNAH OF NIGERIA. FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES, 9(6), 110 - 117. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2025-0906-3719