CHATGPT'S IMPACT ON THE UNIQUENESS OF LAUTECH UNDERGRADUATE FINAL-YEAR STUDENTS’ PROJECTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2025-0905-3467Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Higher Education Institution, Student Project, OriginalityAbstract
The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT has brought about challenges for academic researchers and higher education institutions, especially when drafting final-year projects for students. Assessing traditional human contributions and differentiating between human and AI authorship have surfaced as significant academic issues. This study investigates the prevalence and potential effects of ChatGPT on the originality and creativity of final-year student projects in a higher education institution in south-west Nigeria. A total of one hundred and fifty-two students (152) participated in the survey, and descriptive analysis, along with an independent chi-squared test, was employed for the study. Approximately half of the students in the survey involved ChatGPT to varying degrees in writing different aspects of their project. Among the different parts of the project, data analysis garnered the least attention, while the Abstract attracted the most attention. ChatGPT awareness was not affected by the age group but was influenced by gender. According to the study's results, there were significant gender-based disparities in students' awareness of ChatGPT (p-value < 0.05), with 44.1% indicating a moderate level of familiarity and 58.6% utilizing it for educational purposes. Higher education institutions should not only caution students about the perils of excessively relying on tools like ChatGPT for academic writing but also cultivate a research culture that highly values originality and innovation.
References
Atuahene, F., & Owusu-Ansah, A. (2013). A descriptive assessment of higher education access, participation, equity, and disparity in Ghana. SAGE Open, 3(3), 2158244013490704. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013490704
Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2017). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 672682. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12439
Choi, J. H., Hickman, K. E., Monahan, A., & Schwarcz, D. (2023). ChatGPT goes to law school. Journal of Legal Education. http://jle.aals.org/home/vol71/iss3/2/
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Dale, R. (2021). GPT-3: What's it good for? Natural Language Engineering, 27(1), 113118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324920000601
Danmilmo, & Agency. (2023, February 2). ChatGPT reaches 100 million users two months after launch. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/profile/danmilmo
Deeley, S. (2017). "Using technology to facilitate effective assessment for learning and feedback in higher education," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, pp. 43(3), 439-448. http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1356906
Else, H. (2023). Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature, 613(7945), 423. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
Harahap, M. A. K., Sutrisno, S., Fauzi, F., Jusman, I. A., & Ausat, A. M. A. (2023). The impact of digital technology on employee job stress: A business psychology review. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(1), 36353638. http://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i1.5775
Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341367. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341
Kirmani, A. R. (2022). Artificial intelligence-enabled science poetry. ACS Energy Letters, 8, 574576. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00123
Liu, X., Zheng, Y., Du, Z., Ding, M., Qian, Y., Yang, Z., & Tang, J. (2023). GPT understands, too. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.10385v2
Metz, A. (2022). 6 exciting ways to use ChatGPTfrom coding to poetry. TechRadar. https://www.techradar.com/features/6-exciting-ways-to-use-chatgpt-from-coding-to-poetry
Owolabi, A. T., Okunlola, O. O., Adewuyi, E. T., Idowu, J. I., & Oladapo, O. J. (2024). The advent of ChatGPT: Job made easy or job loss to data analysts. WSEAS Transactions on Computers, 23, 2440. http://doi.org/10.37394/23205.2024.23.3.
Reed, L. (2022). ChatGPT for automated testing: From conversation to code. Sauce Labs. https://saucelabs.com/blog/chatgpt-automated-testing-conversation-to-code
Shin, J. H., & Lee, J. W. (2021). Athlete brand image influence on the behavioral intentions of Generation Z. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 49(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.9751
Smith, S. K. T. (2012). Longitudinal study of digital marketing strategies targeting millennials. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(2), 8692. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761211206396
Stokel-Walker, C. (2023). ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: Many scientists disapprove. Nature, 613(7945), 620621. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
Tagoe M. (2012). Students perceptions on incorporating e-learning into teaching and learning at the University of Ghana. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 8(1), 91103. http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=1356
Terwiesch, C. (2023). Would Chat GPT3 get a Wharton MBA? A prediction based on its performance in the operations management course. Mack Institute for Innovation Management at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
http://mackinstitute.wharton.upenn.edu/2023/would-chat-gpt3-get-a-wharton-mba-new-white-paper-by-christian-terwiesch/
Tung, L. (2023). ChatGPT can write code. Now researchers say it's good at fixing bugs too. ZDNet. https://www.zdnet.com/article/chatgpt-can-write-code-now-researchers-say-its-good-at-fixing-bugs-too
Zhang, Y., Wen, Y., & Hou, M. (2021). The effect of attribute alignability on product purchase: The moderating role of product familiarity and self-construal. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631497
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
FUDMA Journal of Sciences
