APPLICATION OF RANDOMIZED RESPONSE TECHNIQUE ON A SURVEY OF DRUG ABUSE AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN NIGERIA

  • H. J. Okoduwa
  • O. B. Aladeniyi
  • O. A. Famose
Keywords: Prevalence, Adjusted Proportion, Confidence Interval, Peer Pressure, Factors

Abstract

This study investigated the efficacy of the Randomized Response Technique (RRT) in addressing the challenge of underreporting in surveys related to drug abuse in Nigerian Universities. Recognizing the inherent social stigma and confidentially concerns associated with self-disclosure, the RRT is employed as a methodological strategy to elicit more accurate and truthful responses. The research assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of the RRT in uncovering the prevalence and patterns of drug abuse among survey undergraduate students of the Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria. Estimate-adjusted proportion was used to ascertain the drug abuse prevalence while the chi-square test proved to be the most suitable statistic for comparing the relationship between the variables. Confidence interval was used to determine the range in which the true prevalence lied. It was deduced that the proportion of drug abuse among undergraduates using the RRT is 0.3907 which amounts to 39% of the population. Additionally, 64% believed that peer pressure proved to be a strong contributing factor to drug abuse among this population group. While there was no significant relationship between drug abuse and the students’ allowance. Consequently, efforts that aimed at empowering undergraduates in the universities or higher schools of learning against drug abuse should be vigorously pursued by the government and other stakeholders to eradicate or reduce this menace called drug abuse.

References

Adebola, F. B., Adediran, A. A., & Ewemooje, O. S. (2017a). Hybrid tripartite randomized response technique. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 46(23), 11756–11763. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2016.1277760 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2016.1277760

Adebola, F. B., Ewemooje, O. S., & Ayeni, O. C. (2017b). Efficiency of Alternative Estimators in Randomized Response Technique. In Proceeding of 5Th Annual Conference of School of Sciences, SOS (pp. 346-356).

Adebola, F.B., Johnson, O., and Adegoke, N. (2014). A Modified Stratified Randomized Response Techniques. Mathematical Theory and Modeling, 4, 29–42.

Adepetun, A. O., and Adebola, F.B. (2014). On the Relative Efficiency of the Proposed Reparametized Randomized Response Model. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Research. Vol.1, No.1, pp.42-52,.

Blair, G., Imai, K., & Zhou, Y. Y. (2015). Design and Analysis of the Randomized Response Technique. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(511), 1304–1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2015.1050028 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2015.1050028

Chamberlain, A., Nyamu, S., Aminawung, J., Wang, E. A., Shavit, S. and Fox, A. D. (2019). Illicit Substance Use After Release from Prison Among Formerly Incarcerated Primary Care Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. Addict Sci Clin Pract 14:7 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-019-0136-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-019-0136-6

Chamberlain SR, Lust K, and Grant JE (2021). Cocaine use in university students: relationships with demographics, mental health, risky sexual practices, and trait impulsivity. CNS Spectrums 26(5), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852920001492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852920001492

Chaudhuri, A. & Mukherjee, R. (2008). Randomized Response Techniques: A Review. Statistica Neerlandica. 41. 27 - 44. 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1987.tb01169.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1987.tb01169.x

Chaudhuri, A. (2011). Randomized Response and Indirect Questioning Techniques in Surveys. CRC Press, Chapman and Hall, Taylor and Francis Group, FL, USA.

Erlingsson, U., Korolova, A. and Pihur, V. (2014). RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response. Conference on Computer and Communications Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660267.2660348 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2660267.2660348

Ewemooje, O.S., Adebola, F.B., and Adediran, A.A. (2018) “A Stratified Hybrid Tripartite Randomized Response Technique”, Gazi University Journal of Sciences, 31(4): 1246-1266.

Gillespie W, Holt JL, Blackwell RL. (2007). Measuring outcomes of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine use among college students: a preliminary test of the shortened inventory of problems—alcohol and drugs (SIP-AD). J Drug Issues. 1(1):549–568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260703700304

Höglinger, Marc & Ben, Jann & Diekmann, Andreas. (2016). Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys: An Experimental Evaluation of Different Implementations of the Randomized Response Technique and the Crosswise Model. Survey Research Methods. 10. 171-187. 10.18148/srm/2016.v10i3.6703.

Idowu A, Aremu AO, Akanbi IM, Eseigbe G, Adewale V, Awubite L, . . . E, O. (2023). Prevalence, pattern and determinants of substance abuse among youths in a rural community of Osun State, Southwest Nigeria. Afri Health Sci, 23(4). 563-574. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v23i4.59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v23i4.59

Le, T.-N., Lee, S.-M., Tran, P.-L., Li, C.-S. (2023). Randomized Response Techniques: A Systematic Review from the Pioneering Work of Warner (1965) to the Present. Mathematics, 11, 1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11071718 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math11071718

Mukherjee, S. Sinha, B. K. and Chattopadhyay, (2018). Statistical Methods in Social Science Research. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2146-7

O’Connor, E., Thomas, R., Senger, E. A., Perdue, L., Robalino, S. and Patnode, C. (2020). Interventions to Prevent Illicit and Nonmedical Drug Use in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Clinical Review & Education JAMA. 323(20):2067-2079. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.1432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1432

Opendra, S. (2023). Randomized Response in Combination with Direct Response for Estimation of Incidence Parameters of Two Sensitive Qualitative Features. Statistics and Applications, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp 207-215

Oshikoya, K. A. and Alli, A. (2006). Perception of Drug Abuse amongst Nigerian Undergraduates. World Journal of Medical Sciences 1 (2): 133-139.

Paul, F. A., Ganie, A. U. R., & Dar, D. R. (2024). Substance use in university students: a comprehensive examination of its effects on academic achievement and psychological well-being. Social Work in Mental Health, 22(3), 452–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2024.2306935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2024.2306935

Rhoades, K. A., Leve, L. D., Harold, G. T., Kim, H. K., & Chamberlain, P. (2014). Drug use trajectories after a randomized controlled trial of MTFC: Associations with partner drug use. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12077

Sani, M. B. (2018). The Role and Relevance of Sports Psychology in Nigeria. FUDMA Journal of Sciences (FJS) Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 68 - 72

Vogler, A. (2016). Randomized Response A Method for Sensitive Surveys.

Warner, S. L. (1965). Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60(309), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775

Published
2024-06-30
How to Cite
OkoduwaH. J., AladeniyiO. B., & FamoseO. A. (2024). APPLICATION OF RANDOMIZED RESPONSE TECHNIQUE ON A SURVEY OF DRUG ABUSE AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN NIGERIA. FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES, 8(3), 98 - 103. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2024-0803-2539