MODIFICATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF AN IMPORTED THREE-ROW ANIMAL-DRAWN MAIZE PLANTER FOR PLANTING SOYBEANS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2023-0702-1703Keywords:
Evaluation, Germination Count, Planter, Planting Efficiency, Planting SpeedAbstract
Increase in demand of functional and affordable planters and the inability of the peasant farmers in Nigeria to purchase imported planters stressed the need for development of a locally produced planters that could address the challenges encountered in grain planting. A three row imported animal-drawn maize planter was modified having identified its deficiencies. The modified planter consists of hopper, seed metering device, delivery tube, furrow opener, covering device, pressing wheel, frame, handle and traction wheel. It was evaluated in the laboratory and field using maize and Soybean as test crops. Parameters determined are planting speed, seedling emergence, plant to plant spacing, effective field capacity, germination count, planting efficiency, seed delivery rate, number of seeds per hole and percent seed damage. A combination of three planting speeds (2, 1.1 and 0.8m/s) and three seed weights (2.9, 2.2 and 1.1kg) were used for the performance evaluation. Results obtained were analyzed in a Completely Randomized Block Design. It showed that seed delivery rate was 24.8kg/ha and effective field capacity was 0.12ha/ha while the highest germination count of 83% was obtained at 0.8m/s planting speed and 2.9kg seed weight. The best of planting efficiency of 86.4% was obtained at 1.1m/s planting speed and 2.9kg seed weight. Plant to plant distance of 26.4cm was obtained at 2m/s planting speed and 2.2kg seed weight. One seed per hill was obtained at the all combinations. The modified planter has proved to be suitable for eliminating the limitations associated with the imported planter.
References
Aliku, O. and Oshunsamya, O. S. (2016). Establishing relationship between measured and predicted 1 soil water characteristics using SOILWAT model in three agro-ecological zones of Nigeria Department of Agronomy, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., doi:10.5194/gmd-2016-165, 2016 Manuscript under review for journal Geosci. Model Dev. Published: 15 August 2016
Brooks, R. H., and Corey, A. T., (1964). Hydraulic Properties Of Porous Media. Hydrology Paper No. 3, Colorado State U., Fort Collins, Colorado.
FAO (2006). Guidelines for Soil Description (4th edition). FAO, Rome.
Fredlund, D. G., and Rahardjo, H. (1993). Soil Mechanics for Unsaturated Soils. John Wiley &Sons, New York, N. Y.
Fredlund, D.G. and Xing A. (1994) Equations for the soil-water characteristic curve. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 31, 521-532.
Gee, G.W. and Or, D. (2002). Particle Size Analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4, 255-293.
Kern, J.S. (1995). Evaluation of soil water retention models based on basic soil physical properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 5 Vanapalli, S. K., Fredlund, D.G. and Pufahl, D. E. (1999). The Influence of Soil Structure and Stress History on the Soil-Water Characteristics of a Compacted Till. Geotechnique Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 143 – 159
Mualem, Y. (1986). Hydrraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils: prediction and formulas. In Methods of soils analysis. Part1. Physical and mineralogical methods 2nd 3dn, Agronomy (ed. A. klute), pp, 799-823, Madison, Wis: American Society of Agronomy.
Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page et al (eds) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part2. 2nd ed. Agron. monog. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. Pp. 539-579.
Oyeogbe, A. I. and Oluwasemire, K. O. (2013). Evaluation of SOILWAT Model for Predicting Soil Water Characteristics in Southwestern Nigeria. International Journal of Soil Science, 8: 58-67.Bouma, J., 1989. Using soil survey data for quantitative land evaluation. Adv. Soil Sci., 9: 177-213.
Pleysier, J. L. (1995). Soil sampling and sample preparation. IITA research guide, No 2. Ibadan, Nigeria: IITA (p. 27)
Saxton, K. E. and Rawls, W. J. (2006). Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70:1569 – 1578.
Saxton, K. E. and Willey P. H. (2006). The SPAW Model for Agricultural Field and Pond Hydrologic Simulation. Chapter 17 in: Mathematical Modeling of Watershed Hydrology, V. P. singh abd D. frevert, (Ed.); CRC Press LLC.Sigua, C. G and Hudnall, W. H.(2008). Kriging analysis of soil properties. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 8.10.1007/s11368-008-0003-7
van Genuchten, M.Th. (1980). A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.44:892–898.
Vanapalli, S. K., Fredlund, D.G. and Pufahl, D. E. (1999). The Influence of Soil Structure and Stress History on the Soil-Water Characteristics of a Compacted Till. Geotechnique Vol. 48,No. 2, pp. 143 – 159
Walczak, T. R., Witkowska-Walczak, B. and Slawinski, C. (2002). Comparison of correlation models for the estimation of the water retention characteristics of soil. Int. Agrophys., 16: 79-82.9: 1134-1141.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
FUDMA Journal of Sciences
