A SAFETY DRIVEN REVIEW OF WEARABLE AND A PROPOSED SAFETY FRAMEWORK

  • O. M. Olanrewaju
  • Faith O. Adebiyi Federal University Dutsin-Ma
Keywords: wearable, emissions, hazards, standards, EMI, SAR

Abstract

As computers move from the desktop, to the palm top, and onto our bodies and into our everyday lives, infinite opportunities arise to realize various applications that have never before been possible. As wearable technologies such as the Google Glass, Earbuds are developed and released to the public, health problems resulting from volume of rays that are penetrating human bodies through the signal emissions from these devices must be acknowledged and accounted for. This paper presents wearable computer devices their uses, hazards and the need for the adoption of global safety standards in order to make them safe for users. It also proposed a framework for evaluating the safety use of the wearable devices.

References

Asai, K. (2010). The Role of Head Up Display in Computer Assisted Instruction. Human-Computer Interaction, New Developments, 31-48.

Bodelid, P., & Oscarsen, A. (2002). Wearable Computing: An Introduction. Wearable Computing.

Chittaro, L. (2003). Human-Computer Interaction with Mobild Devices and Services. Springer Science & Business Media, (pp. 61-75). Udine, Italy.

Fitbit Device. (2014). Retrieved from Stroke Survivors Tattler.

ICNIRP. (1998). Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Health Phys, 494-522.

IEEE. (2005). IEEE Standard fro Safety Levels with respect to human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300 GHz. In International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety, IEEE Standard. New York.

Moulton, J. (2010). World Wide SAR Test Standards. San Marcos.

New Health Advisor. (2015, August 19). Fitbit Sleep Tracking. Retrieved from New Health Advisor.

Randewich, N. (2014, January 6). Intel shows off wearable gadgets as chipmaker expands beyond PCs. Las Vegas, Nevada.

Sean. (2016). The top 10 best wireless Earbuds in the market. Retrieved from The Wire Realm: http://www.wirerealm.com/guides/top-10-best-wireless-earbuds

Starner, T., Mann, S., Rhodes, B., Levine, J.-r., Healey, J., Kirsch, D., . . . Pentland, A. (1997). Augumented Reality Through Wearable Computing. Presence, 6(4), 386-398.

Stone, W. T. (2013). Google Glass and Wearable Technology: A New Generation of Security Concerns. Retrieved from Tufts University.

WHO. (2007). Extremely Low Frequency Fields, Environmental Health Criteria 238. Geneva, Switzerland.

Published
2023-03-12
How to Cite
OlanrewajuO. M., & AdebiyiF. O. (2023). A SAFETY DRIVEN REVIEW OF WEARABLE AND A PROPOSED SAFETY FRAMEWORK. FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES, 1(1), 35 - 39. Retrieved from https://fjs.fudutsinma.edu.ng/index.php/fjs/article/view/1217