EFFECT OF DIFFERENT RATES OF BIOCHAR ON NODULATION AND YEILD OF SOYBEAN (Glycine max.L.merill)

Authors

  • MUHAMMAD GWAM SODAH MR
  • O. J. Jayeoba
  • S. M. Amana
  • I. M. Jibrin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2022-0604-1036

Keywords:

Biochar; nodulation; optimum level; sustainable; soybean yield

Abstract

The experiments were conducted at the Teaching and Research Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Nasarawa State University, Shabu-Lafia Campus during 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons to evaluate the effect of different rates of biochar on nodulation and yield of soybean in Lafia, Southern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. The experiments were laid in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Biochar at the rates of 0, 4, 8 and 12 tons/ha was incorporated into ridges at planting. Four seeds of soybean were planted per hole at a spacing of 5cm between plants on four manually prepared ridges of 2 m long spaced at approximately 75cm. The seedlings were thinned to two plants after two weeks of planting (WAP). All data collected were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using GENSTAT statistical package while least significant difference was used to separate treatment means at 5% level of probability. The results obtained showed that biochar at the rate of 8 tons/ha significantly (p<0.05) produced the highest number of nodules (20.8 and 16.4), recorded the heaviest weight per 100 seeds (16.9 and 14.9g) and grain yield of soybean (1304.0 and 1316.7 kg/ha) in both cropping seasons. The results further revealed that the highest dose of biochar (12 tons/ha) in this study did not necessarily influence and increase any parameter tested except over the control (0.0 tons/ha) in both cropping seasons. Therefore biochar at the rate of 8 tons/ha is hereby considered to be the optimum rate for sustainable soybean production in the study area.

References

Abbott, A. (2012) Stress and the city; Urban decay. http://www.nature.com/ news. stress-and–the –city.urban- decay-1.11556. Retrieved 5/26/2015.

Adebomi, O., Taiwo, A. and Olufemi, A. (2010) Personality Factors as Correlates of Perceived Quality of Life among Adolescents with Hearing Impairment in Selected Secondary Schools in Lagos State. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 4 No. 9. Pp 163, University of Ibadan Nigeria.

Ajibuah, J. B. (2008) Ethno-Religious Conflicts and Residential Segregation in Kaduna Metropolis: Immediate Causes of Violent Conflicts.pp85-88. Unpublished PhD thesis Bayero University Kano, Negeria.

Akinyemi, O. O., Owoeye, E. T., Popoola, O. A. and Ilesanmi, O. S. (2012). Quality of Life and Associated Factors among Adults in a Community in South West Nigeria. Annals of Ibadan Postgraduate Medicine, Vol. 10 No. 2 pp 34 and38 – 39.

Aloba, O.; Fatoye, O,; Mapayi,B. and Akinsulore,S. (2002) A review of quality of Life studies in Nigeria Patients with Psychiatric disorder. Department of Mental Health, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University Ile Ife, Nigeria.

Aston-Jones, Arnott, S. and Douglas, O. (1998). Social Infrastructures and the urban environment. Housing. The Human Ecosystem of the Niger Delta: An Environmental Right Action (ERA) Kraft Books Ltd. Ibadan, Nigeria.

Bowling, A., Farquhar, M., & Browne, P. (1991). Life Satisfaction and associations with social network and social support variables in three samples of elderly people. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 6, 549-566.

Brock, K,; Mc. Gee, R. and Gaventa, J. (EDS) (2004). Perception of poverty in Kaduna and Benue. Unpacking policy Knowledge, Actors and Spaces in poverty Reduction in Uganda and Nigeria. Fountain Publishers Ltd Kampala.

Creswell, J.W.; Plano C., Vicki, L.; Gutman, Michelle L., and Hanson, William E. (2003). Advanced Mixed Methods Research Designs. In Abbas Tashakkori and Charles Teddlie (Eds.) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Cummins, R.A. (1996). The domains of Life Satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303-328.

Cummins, R.A. (1997). The Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale manual (5th ed.). Melbourne: Deakin University, Psychology Center.

Farquhar, M. (1995). Elderly people’s definition of QOL. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1439-1446.

Felce, D., and Perry, J (1995). QOL: Its definition and measurement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16, 51-74.

KSML&S (2015). Kaduna State Ministry of Land and Survey, Maps and GIS Department, Kaduna.

NPC, (2006). Population and Housing Census, 2006. National Population Commission, Abuja, Nigeria.

Ferris, C., and Bramston, P. (1994). Quality of Life in the elderly: A contribution to its understanding. Australian Journal of Ageing, 13, 120-123

Gans, H. J. (2001). The Uses of Poverty. The poor pay all: In Henslin, J, M. (ED) Eleven Edition. Down to Earth Sociology. Introductory Readings. The Free Press London.

Swain, D. (2002). Measuring progress: community indicators and the quality of life. Jacksonville, FL: Jacksonville Community Council, Inc., pp. 9 and 15

Published

2022-08-15

How to Cite

SODAH, M. G., Jayeoba, O. J., Amana, S. M., & Jibrin, I. M. (2022). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT RATES OF BIOCHAR ON NODULATION AND YEILD OF SOYBEAN (Glycine max.L.merill). FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES, 6(4), 12 - 16. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2022-0604-1036